<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Payment friction: why is there a queue at the checkout, but not at the shelves?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matt.me63.com/2006/10/24/payment-friction-why-is-there-a-queue-at-the-checkout-but-not-at-the-shelves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matt.me63.com/2006/10/24/payment-friction-why-is-there-a-queue-at-the-checkout-but-not-at-the-shelves/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattedgar</title>
		<link>http://matt.me63.com/2006/10/24/payment-friction-why-is-there-a-queue-at-the-checkout-but-not-at-the-shelves/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mattedgar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me63.wordpress.com/2006/10/24/payment-friction-why-is-there-a-queue-at-the-checkout-but-not-at-the-shelves/#comment-217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, thanks. I ask a silly question and get a well-thought-out answer in return :)
I guess what prompted that post was the thought that sometimes the inconvenience of paying far outweighs the financial cost, like the free newspaper example, where I wouldn&#039;t have minded paying 20p, but wouldn&#039;t bother if it slowed down my entry into the train station.
If technology allows us to pay for stuff effortlessly, what will that do to existing retail business models?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks. I ask a silly question and get a well-thought-out answer in return :)<br />
I guess what prompted that post was the thought that sometimes the inconvenience of paying far outweighs the financial cost, like the free newspaper example, where I wouldn&#8217;t have minded paying 20p, but wouldn&#8217;t bother if it slowed down my entry into the train station.<br />
If technology allows us to pay for stuff effortlessly, what will that do to existing retail business models?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunboar</title>
		<link>http://matt.me63.com/2006/10/24/payment-friction-why-is-there-a-queue-at-the-checkout-but-not-at-the-shelves/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sunboar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://me63.wordpress.com/2006/10/24/payment-friction-why-is-there-a-queue-at-the-checkout-but-not-at-the-shelves/#comment-203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Came across your site through Tagsurf. Offhand - I could think of:

1) At the shelves, you take one (or a few) items at a time. At the checkout, you may have fifty.

2) There are many more shelves (or space around shelves) vs check out. 

3) Taking items from a shelf is a dispersed, quasi-random activity. Checking-out is channeling all those random people through a pipe.

4) At checkout, you need to lift stuff out, scan, pack, pay. At shelves, you can just dump it in your basket.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across your site through Tagsurf. Offhand &#8211; I could think of:</p>
<p>1) At the shelves, you take one (or a few) items at a time. At the checkout, you may have fifty.</p>
<p>2) There are many more shelves (or space around shelves) vs check out. </p>
<p>3) Taking items from a shelf is a dispersed, quasi-random activity. Checking-out is channeling all those random people through a pipe.</p>
<p>4) At checkout, you need to lift stuff out, scan, pack, pay. At shelves, you can just dump it in your basket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

